Nissan Almera 1998 vs Nissan Almera 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Double-row timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 132 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.8 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan Almera 2000 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Almera 1998 engine produces 35 HP less power than Nissan Almera 2000, whereas torque is 98 NM less than Nissan Almera 2000. Due to the lower power, Nissan Almera 1998 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Almera 2000 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Almera 1998 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera 2000, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Almera 1998 could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Almera 1998 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera 2000. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Almera 2000 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Nissan Almera Tino | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Almera 1998 is 4 cm shorter than the Nissan Almera 2000, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Almera 1998 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 355 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1100 litres | |
| Nissan Almera 1998 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Almera 2000. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`630 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |