Nissan Almera 1998 vs Renault Scenic 2001
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 132 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.8 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Almera engine produces 30 HP less power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 68 NM less than Renault Scenic. Due to the lower power, Nissan Almera reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Almera is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan Almera consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Almera could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Almera consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2001 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Renault Scenic 2001 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Nissan Almera is smaller. Nissan Almera is 3 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Almera is 26 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`630 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Nissan Almera has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Nissan Almera, so Nissan Almera quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 6.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |