Nissan Almera 1998 vs Ford Focus 1998
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 87 HP | 100 HP | |
Torque: | 116 NM | 145 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
Ford Focus is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Almera engine produces 13 HP less power than Ford Focus, whereas torque is 29 NM less than Ford Focus. Due to the lower power, Nissan Almera reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.0 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
860 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
670 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Ford Focus gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.14 m | 4.15 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Almera is 1 cm shorter than the Ford Focus, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Almera is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 350 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1210 litres | |
Nissan Almera has 10 litres less trunk space than the Ford Focus. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 1.3 metres less than that of the Ford Focus, which means Nissan Almera can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`545 | 1`590 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Nissan Almera has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Focus, so Nissan Almera quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 7.6/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Ford Focus has
| |