Nissan Almera 1998 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2004
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 87 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Nissan Almera is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Almera engine produces 5 HP more power than Mitsubishi Lancer, but torque is 4 NM less than Mitsubishi Lancer. Thanks to more power Nissan Almera reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Almera consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Almera could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Lancer gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Carisma, Mitsubishi Colt, Mitsubishi Space Star | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Lancer might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Nissan Almera is smaller. Nissan Almera is 34 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Almera is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 430 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has more luggage space. Nissan Almera has 90 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`545 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 8.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |