Nissan Almera 1998 vs Audi A2 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 87 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 126 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Audi A2 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Almera engine produces 12 HP more power than Audi A2, but torque is 10 NM less than Audi A2. Despite the higher power, Nissan Almera reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Almera consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Almera could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Almera consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A2 2000 1.4 engine: Engine is known for its simplicity, compact design, and overall reliability. Many complaints from owners are related to power loss or fluctuating idle, often caused by issues with the throttle body, EGR valve, or air leaks ... More about Audi A2 2000 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Nissan Almera is larger, but lower. Nissan Almera is 31 cm longer than the Audi A2, 2 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Almera is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1085 litres | |
|
Audi A2 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Almera has 50 litres less trunk space than the Audi A2. This could mean that the Nissan Almera uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.7 metres less than that of the Audi A2, which means Nissan Almera can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`545 | 1`435 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Audi A2 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Nissan Almera, so Audi A2 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Audi A2 has
| |