Nissan Almera 2003 vs Mazda 3 2007

 
Nissan Almera
2003 - 2006
Mazda 3
2007 - 2009
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 136 HP143 HP
Torque: 304 NM360 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 seconds9.9 seconds
Nissan Almera engine produces 7 HP less power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 56 NM less than Mazda 3. Despite less power, Nissan Almera reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.96.0
Real fuel consumption: 6.5 l/100km6.6 l/100km
By specification Nissan Almera consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Nissan Almera over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Almera consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1010 km in combined cycle910 km in combined cycle
1250 km on highway1010 km on highway
920 km with real consumption830 km with real consumption
Nissan Almera gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 440'000 km390'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Almera engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 6 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Primera, Nissan Almera TinoInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 5
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Almera might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.20 m4.49 m
Width: 1.71 m1.76 m
Height: 1.45 m1.47 m
Nissan Almera is smaller.
Nissan Almera is 29 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Almera is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 355 litres413 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1020 litres1285 litres
Mazda 3 has more luggage space.
Nissan Almera has 58 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 265 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Nissan Almera can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8101`925
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

high
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Almera has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 10002600
Rating in user reviews: 9.2/10 8.8/10
Pros and Cons: Nissan Almera has
  • timing chain engine
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Mazda 3 has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • roomier boot
  • electric power steering
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv