Nissan Almera 2002 vs Toyota Corolla 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Toyota Corolla is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Almera engine produces 34 HP less power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 95 NM less than Toyota Corolla. Due to the lower power, Nissan Almera reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Almera is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Almera consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that by driving the Nissan Almera over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Almera consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Almera gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Nissan Micra, Suzuki Jimny | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Corolla Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Toyota Corolla 2004 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota Corolla 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Almera is 2 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Almera is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 355 litres | 310 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1020 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Almera has more luggage capacity. Nissan Almera has 45 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Corolla. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`735 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Toyota Corolla has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Almera has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Toyota Corolla, so Toyota Corolla quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.2/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |