Nissan Almera 2002 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Almera engine produces 68 HP less power than Chrysler PT Cruiser, whereas torque is 115 NM less than Chrysler PT Cruiser. Due to the lower power, Nissan Almera reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Almera is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Almera consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means that by driving the Nissan Almera over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Almera consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Almera gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.60 m | |
| Nissan Almera is 9 cm shorter than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, 1 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Almera is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 355 litres | 538 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1020 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has more luggage space. Nissan Almera has 183 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler PT Cruiser. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.7 metres less than that of the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means Nissan Almera can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`735 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |