Nissan Almera 2019 vs Mazda 3 2006

 
Nissan Almera
2019 -
Mazda 3
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 100 HP84 HP
Torque: 152 NM122 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds14.9 seconds
Nissan Almera engine produces 16 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Mazda 3.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.26.7
The Nissan Almera is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Nissan Almera consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Nissan Almera over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 35 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 830 km in combined cycle820 km in combined cycle
Ground clearance: 135 mm (5.3 inches)160 mm (6.3 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 3 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.49 m
Width: 1.74 m1.78 m
Height: 1.46 m1.47 m
Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Almera and Mazda 3 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: no data413 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1285 litres
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Nissan Almera can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`715
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): no data2400
Pros and Cons: Nissan Almera has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
Mazda 3 has
  • higher ground clearance
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv