Nissan Almera 2019 vs Mazda 3 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan Almera is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mazda 3 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.0 (petrol) | 1.3 - 2.3 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 84 - 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 152 NM | 122 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.1 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.7 - 9.7 | |
|
Nissan Almera petrol engines consumes on average 4.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Almera and Mazda 3 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1285 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Nissan Almera can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`796 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |