Nissan Almera 2000 vs Mitsubishi Colt 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.2 (petrol, diesel) | 1.3 - 1.6 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 114 HP | 75 - 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 - 230 NM | 108 - 141 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 13.8 seconds | 10.5 - 15.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 7.8 | 6.9 - 8.4 | |
|
Nissan Almera petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Nissan Almera is larger. Nissan Almera is 30 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Almera is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 355 litres | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1100 litres | 830 litres | |
|
Nissan Almera has more luggage capacity. Nissan Almera has 115 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera (by 270 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Nissan Almera can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`740 | ~ 1`471 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |