Nissan Almera 2002 vs Mazda 2 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.2 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 136 HP | 68 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 136 - 304 NM | 110 - 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 14.5 seconds | 11.4 - 16 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 7.8 | 4.5 - 7.1 | |
|
Nissan Almera petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 2. On average, Nissan Almera equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Nissan Almera is larger, but lower. Nissan Almera is 28 cm longer than the Mazda 2, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Almera is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 355 litres | 267 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1020 litres | 1044 litres | |
| Nissan Almera has 88 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 2 (by 24 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda 2, which means Nissan Almera can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`762 | ~ 1`512 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |