Nissan Almera 2000 vs Seat Toledo 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.2 | 1.6 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 114 HP | 90 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 - 230 NM | 145 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 13.8 seconds | 8 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 7.8 | 5.0 - 9.3 | |
|
Nissan Almera petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Seat Toledo. On average, Nissan Almera equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Nissan Almera is smaller. Nissan Almera is 2 cm shorter than the Seat Toledo, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 393 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.5 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo, which means Nissan Almera can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`734 | ~ 1`349 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |