Nissan Almera 2000 vs Nissan Almera 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.2 | 1.5 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 114 HP | 82 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 - 230 NM | 136 - 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 13.8 seconds | 9.2 - 14.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 7.8 | 4.8 - 7.8 | |
|
On average, the Nissan Almera 2000 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Nissan Almera 2002. On average, Nissan Almera 2000 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera 2002. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 140 - 165 mm (5.5 - 6.5 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Almera 2002 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Almera 2000 is 2 cm shorter than the Nissan Almera 2002, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 393 litres | 393 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`734 | ~ 1`749 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |