Nissan Almera 2000 vs Mazda 3 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.2 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 114 HP | 105 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 - 230 NM | 145 - 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 13.8 seconds | 9 - 12.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 7.8 | 5.0 - 8.2 | |
|
Nissan Almera petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Nissan Almera equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Nissan Almera is smaller. Nissan Almera is 7 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Almera is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 393 litres | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 675 litres | |
| Nissan Almera has 20 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`734 | ~ 1`718 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |