Nissan Almera 2002 vs Toyota Corolla 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.2 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 136 HP | 90 - 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 136 - 314 NM | 130 - 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 14.5 seconds | 10.2 - 12.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 7.8 | 5.7 - 7.8 | |
|
Nissan Almera petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Corolla. On average, Nissan Almera equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.44 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Almera is 6 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Almera is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 393 litres | 473 litres | |
|
Toyota Corolla has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Almera has 80 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Corolla. This could mean that the Nissan Almera uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`749 | ~ 1`676 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.4/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |