Nissan Almera 2006 vs Toyota Corolla 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 (petrol) | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 107 HP | 90 - 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 130 - 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 - 13.9 seconds | 10.2 - 12.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 - 7.6 | 5.7 - 7.8 | |
|
On average, the Nissan Almera petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Toyota Corolla. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.47 m | |
| Nissan Almera is 13 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Almera is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 473 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan Almera has 13 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Corolla. This could mean that the Nissan Almera uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Nissan Almera can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`700 | ~ 1`676 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |