Nissan Almera 2006 vs Mazda 3 2006

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Nissan Almera
2006 - 2012
Mazda 3
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 (petrol)1.3 - 2.3 (petrol, diesel)
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda 3 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types.

Performance

Power: 107 HP84 - 260 HP
Torque: 150 NM122 - 380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.1 - 13.9 seconds6.1 - 14.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.8 - 7.64.7 - 9.7
Nissan Almera petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.51 m4.49 m
Width: 1.71 m1.76 m
Height: 1.44 m1.47 m
Nissan Almera is 2 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Almera is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres413 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1285 litres
Nissan Almera has more luggage capacity.
Nissan Almera has 47 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mazda 3.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`700~ 1`796
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 14002200
Pros and Cons: Nissan Almera has
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Mazda 3 has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv