Nissan Almera 2012 vs Mazda 3 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 105 - 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 145 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 - 12.7 seconds | 8.2 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 8.5 | 4.4 - 8.1 | |
|
Nissan Almera petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | 150 - 155 mm (5.9 - 6.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Almera can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.47 m | |
| Nissan Almera is 8 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Almera is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 430 litres | |
|
Nissan Almera has more luggage capacity. Nissan Almera has 70 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 1 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Nissan Almera can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`625 | ~ 1`827 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |