Nissan Almera 2012 vs Chrysler 200 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan Almera is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Chrysler 200 is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Almera is available only with front wheel drive, while Chrysler 200 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 | 2.4 - 3.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 187 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 234 - 355 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 - 12.7 seconds | 6.5 - 9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 8.5 | 8.5 - 10.2 | |
|
Nissan Almera petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler 200. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | 147 mm (5.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Almera can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Nissan Almera is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan Almera is 23 cm shorter than the Chrysler 200, 18 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Almera is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 463 litres | |
|
Nissan Almera has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Nissan Almera has 37 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler 200. The Chrysler 200 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.7 metres less than that of the Chrysler 200, which means Nissan Almera can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`625 | ~ 2`141 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Chrysler 200 has
| |