Nissan Almera 1995 vs Nissan Almera 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.5 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 99 HP | 90 - 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 136 NM | 128 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 - 16.8 seconds | 11.1 - 13.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 8.2 | 5.7 - 7.8 | |
|
Nissan Almera 1995 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Almera 2000. On average, Nissan Almera 1995 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera 2000. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Almera 1995 is 4 cm shorter than the Nissan Almera 2000, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Almera 1995 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 355 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1100 litres | |
| Nissan Almera 1995 has 15 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Almera 2000. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`591 | ~ 1`740 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |