Nissan Almera 1995 vs Nissan Micra 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.0 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 99 HP | 57 - 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 136 NM | 80 - 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 - 16.8 seconds | 11.9 - 18.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 8.2 | 5.2 - 6.4 | |
|
Nissan Almera petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Micra. On average, Nissan Almera equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 3.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Nissan Almera is larger, but slightly lower. Nissan Almera is 39 cm longer than the Nissan Micra, 9 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Almera is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 206 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 960 litres | |
|
Nissan Almera has more luggage capacity. Nissan Almera has 134 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.6 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Nissan Almera can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`591 | ~ 1`358 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |