Nissan Almera 1995 vs Audi A2 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 99 HP | 61 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 136 NM | 126 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 - 16.8 seconds | 9.8 - 14.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 8.2 | 2.9 - 5.9 | |
|
Nissan Almera petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi A2. On average, Nissan Almera equipped with diesel engines consume 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Nissan Almera is larger, but lower. Nissan Almera is 31 cm longer than the Audi A2, 2 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Almera is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1085 litres | |
|
Audi A2 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Almera has 50 litres less trunk space than the Audi A2. This could mean that the Nissan Almera uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.1 metres more than that of the Audi A2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`591 | ~ 1`452 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Audi A2 has
| |