Nissan Almera 2000 vs Renault Scenic 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.2 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 114 HP | 80 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 - 230 NM | 127 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 13.8 seconds | 10.2 - 15.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 7.8 | 5.7 - 8.5 | |
|
Nissan Almera petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Scenic. On average, Nissan Almera equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Nissan Almera is larger, but lower. Nissan Almera is 1 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 1 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Almera is 23 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 355 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1100 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`740 | ~ 1`306 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
| |