Nissan Almera 2000 vs Mazda 323 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.2 | 1.3 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 114 HP | 75 - 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 - 230 NM | 108 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 13.8 seconds | 9.7 - 15.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 7.8 | 5.8 - 9.2 | |
|
Nissan Almera petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 323. On average, Nissan Almera equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 323. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Almera is 7 cm shorter than the Mazda 323, 1 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Almera is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 355 litres | 355 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1100 litres | 1000 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda 323. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`740 | ~ 1`624 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
| |