Moskvitch 412 1967 vs SAAB 9000 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 NM | 177 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
SAAB 9000 is a more dynamic driving. Moskvitch 412 engine produces 55 HP less power than SAAB 9000, whereas torque is 69 NM less than SAAB 9000. Due to the lower power, Moskvitch 412 reaches 100 km/h speed 7.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 66 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (SAAB 9000) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Moskvitch 412) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | no data | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.55 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.42 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`520 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
SAAB 9000 has
| |