Moskvitch 412 1967 vs VAZ 2108 1984
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Moskvitch 412 is available with rear wheel drive, while VAZ 2108 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.5 | 1.1 - 1.7 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 54 - 140 HP | |
Torque: | 108 NM | 79 - 186 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19 seconds | 8 - 17 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.4 - 10.2 | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | no data | 4.01 m | |
Width: | 1.55 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.42 m | |
Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 330 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Moskvitch 412 has 20 litres more trunk space than the VAZ 2108. The VAZ 2108 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`520 | ~ 1`361 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Moskvitch 412 has
|
| |