Moskvitch 412 1967 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
| Moskvitch 412 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mazda CX-5 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Moskvitch 412 is available only with rear wheel drive, while Mazda CX-5 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda CX-5 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 150 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 108 NM | 210 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19 seconds | 7.9 - 10.2 seconds | |
| In general, Mazda CX-5 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Moskvitch 412. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.6 - 7.3 | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | no data | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.55 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.69 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Moskvitch 412 has 155 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`520 kg | ~ 2`045 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Moskvitch 412 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |