Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1998 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 211 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine produces 32 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 41 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Wagon reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Wagon could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 3 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 240 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1930 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`180 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, so Mitsubishi Space Wagon quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 6.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |