Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1998 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 211 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine produces 3 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Runner, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Runner. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Wagon reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Wagon could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Runner gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 470'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 39 years | 39 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Pajero, Mitsubishi Outlander | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Space Wagon, Mitsubishi Galant | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Wagon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is larger. Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 31 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, 8 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 240 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1930 litres | 1800 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Wagon (by 130 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means Mitsubishi Space Wagon can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`180 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |