Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1998 vs Mazda MPV 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 211 NM | 207 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine produces 23 HP less power than Mazda MPV, but torque is 4 NM more than Mazda MPV. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Space Wagon reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 11.1 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MPV, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Wagon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 470'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 39 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Pajero, Mitsubishi Outlander | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Wagon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 15 cm shorter than the Mazda MPV, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 481 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 240 litres | 481 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1930 litres | 1600 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Mazda MPV has more luggage space (by 241 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Wagon (by 330 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda MPV, which means Mitsubishi Space Wagon can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`180 | 2`230 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Mazda MPV has
| |