Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1998 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 211 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine produces 57 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 54 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Wagon reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 11.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Wagon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 3 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1930 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Mitsubishi Space Wagon can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`260 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, so Mitsubishi Space Wagon quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 6.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |