Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1998 vs Mitsubishi Grandis 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 211 NM | 217 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Grandis is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine produces 18 HP less power than Mitsubishi Grandis, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Mitsubishi Grandis. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Wagon reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Grandis is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Grandis, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Wagon could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Grandis. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Grandis gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 470'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 41 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Pajero, Mitsubishi Outlander | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Eclipse | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Wagon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is smaller, but slightly higher. Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 16 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Grandis, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 320 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 240 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1930 litres | 1545 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Wagon (by 385 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`260 kg | 2`250 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`685 kg | 1`645 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 575 kg | 605 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Mitsubishi Grandis has
| |