Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1998 vs Honda Stream 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 211 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Honda Stream is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine produces 9 HP less power than Honda Stream, but torque is 19 NM more than Honda Stream. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Wagon reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Stream is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Stream, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Wagon could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Stream. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda Stream gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 470'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 40 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Pajero, Mitsubishi Outlander | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda CR-V, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Wagon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Honda Stream 2001 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda Stream 2001 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is larger. Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 3 cm longer than the Honda Stream, 8 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 158 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 158 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 240 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1930 litres | 1520 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Wagon (by 410 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`260 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Honda Stream has
| |