Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1998 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 215 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 299 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine produces 79 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Runner, whereas torque is 121 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Runner. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 9.2 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Wagon could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Runner gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 32 years | 45 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Runner might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mitsubishi Space Runner engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is larger. Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 31 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, 8 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1930 litres | 1800 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Space Wagon has 190 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Runner. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Space Wagon uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Wagon (by 130 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means Mitsubishi Space Wagon can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |