Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1992 vs Honda CR-V 1997
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine produces 5 HP more power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 6 NM less than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Wagon reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 10.2 | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Wagon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 680 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 45 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Wagon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 2 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 212 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 212 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1714 litres | 670 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Wagon (by 1044 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 0.4 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mitsubishi Space Wagon can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |