Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1992 vs Honda Civic 1996
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Honda Civic is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine produces 27 HP less power than Honda Civic, but torque is 23 NM more than Honda Civic. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Wagon reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 8.4 | |
|
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Wagon could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 530 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 650 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 44 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander | Used also on Honda CRX | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Wagon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.39 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 6 cm longer than the Honda Civic, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 24 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 212 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 212 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1714 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 1 metres more than that of the Honda Civic, which means Mitsubishi Space Wagon can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`690 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Civic has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, so Mitsubishi Space Wagon quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 9.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Honda Civic has
| |