Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1992 vs Mazda Premacy 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine produces 33 HP more power than Mazda Premacy, whereas torque is 24 NM more than Mazda Premacy. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Wagon reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda Premacy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Premacy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Wagon could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Premacy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda Premacy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 45 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 626, Mazda 323 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Wagon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.57 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 20 cm longer than the Mazda Premacy, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 212 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 212 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1714 litres | 1848 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Premacy (by 134 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda Premacy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 1`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Mazda Premacy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Space Wagon has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda Premacy, so Mazda Premacy quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Mazda Premacy has
| |