Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1992 vs Honda CR-V 1997
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Mitsubishi Space Wagon) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Honda CR-V) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.8 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine produces 46 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Wagon reaches 100 km/h speed 7.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 10.1 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Wagon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 1997: Car has Honda`s real-time four-wheel drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. Multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to clutch by dual pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 3 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 212 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 212 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1714 litres | 670 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Wagon (by 1044 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 0.4 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mitsubishi Space Wagon can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |