Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1992 vs Seat Alhambra 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.8 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Seat Alhambra is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine produces 33 HP less power than Seat Alhambra, whereas torque is 138 NM less than Seat Alhambra. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Wagon reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 6.3 | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Wagon could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 13 cm shorter than the Seat Alhambra, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 212 litres | 256 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 212 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 256 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1714 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 0.9 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra, which means Mitsubishi Space Wagon can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Alhambra has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, so Mitsubishi Space Wagon quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |