Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1992 vs Renault Espace 1999
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 82 HP | 98 HP | |
Torque: | 172 NM | 200 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.8 seconds | 15 seconds | |
Renault Espace is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine produces 16 HP less power than Renault Espace, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Renault Espace. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Wagon reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 6.6 | |
The Renault Espace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Espace, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Wagon could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 78 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
Renault Espace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.50 m | 4.52 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.58 m | 1.77 m | |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 2 cm shorter than the Renault Espace, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 19 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | 212 litres | 275 litres | |
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 212 litres | 275 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1714 litres | 2850 litres | |
In 7-seat version Renault Espace has more luggage space (by 63 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Espace (by 1136 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Espace, which means Mitsubishi Space Wagon can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 2`270 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | above average | average | |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Espace has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, so Mitsubishi Space Wagon quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Renault Espace has
| |