Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1992 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2001

 
Mitsubishi Space Wagon
1992 - 1999
Mitsubishi Space Star
2001 - 2002
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 82 HP102 HP
Torque: 172 NM215 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 17.8 seconds12 seconds
Mitsubishi Space Star is a more dynamic driving.
Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine produces 20 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Star, whereas torque is 43 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Star. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Wagon reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.15.5
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Wagon could require 390 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 740 km in combined cycle1000 km in combined cycle
Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Mitsubishi Space Star 2001 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ...  More about Mitsubishi Space Star 2001 1.9 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.03 m
Width: 1.70 m1.72 m
Height: 1.58 m1.52 m
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 47 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 6 cm higher.
Seats: 7 seats5 seats
Trunk capacity: 212 litres370 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 212 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: no data370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1714 litres1370 litres
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Wagon (by 344 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters9.6 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 1.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means Mitsubishi Space Wagon can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9001`730
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 800800
Pros and Cons:
    Mitsubishi Space Star has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • better manoeuvrability
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv