Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1991 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 161 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine produces 14 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Runner, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Runner. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Wagon reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 10.1 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Wagon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 45 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Space Runner | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Runner might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.65 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 23 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 212 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1714 litres | 1800 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Space Wagon has 218 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Runner. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Space Wagon uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Runner (by 86 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means Mitsubishi Space Wagon can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |