Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1991 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 161 NM | 161 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon and Mitsubishi Space Runner have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mitsubishi Space Wagon reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 9.8 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Wagon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 23 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.66 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 25 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 212 litres | 676 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1714 litres | 1498 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Space Wagon has 464 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Runner. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Space Wagon uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Wagon (by 216 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means Mitsubishi Space Wagon can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 6.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |