Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1991 vs Mazda Premacy 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 161 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine produces 22 HP more power than Mazda Premacy, whereas torque is 9 NM more than Mazda Premacy. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Wagon reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.3 | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Premacy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Wagon could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda Premacy engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Space Runner | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 626, Mazda 323 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.57 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 22 cm longer than the Mazda Premacy, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 212 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1714 litres | 1848 litres | |
|
Mazda Premacy has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Space Wagon has 208 litres less trunk space than the Mazda Premacy. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Space Wagon uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Premacy (by 134 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda Premacy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 1`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Mazda Premacy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Space Wagon has serious deffects in 470 percent more cases than Mazda Premacy, so Mazda Premacy quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Mazda Premacy has
| |