Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1991 vs Toyota Picnic 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 161 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Toyota Picnic is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine produces 6 HP less power than Toyota Picnic, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Toyota Picnic. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Wagon reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 9.0 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Wagon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Space Runner | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Carina E, Toyota Hiace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.62 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 1 cm shorter than the Toyota Picnic, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 212 litres | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1714 litres | 1840 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Space Wagon has 32 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Picnic. The Toyota Picnic may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Picnic (by 126 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Space Wagon has serious deffects in 775 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |