Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1991 vs Nissan Serena 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 97 HP | |
| Torque: | 161 NM | 131 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 17.9 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine produces 25 HP more power than Nissan Serena, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Nissan Serena. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Wagon reaches 100 km/h speed 6.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 9.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Serena, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Wagon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Mitsubishi Space Wagon) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Nissan Serena) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.84 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 20 cm longer than the Nissan Serena, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 26 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 212 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1714 litres | 620 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Space Wagon has 138 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Serena. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Space Wagon uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Wagon (by 1094 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Nissan Serena has
| |