Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1999 vs Mitsubishi Grandis 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 217 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Grandis is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine produces 15 HP less power than Mitsubishi Grandis, but torque is 8 NM more than Mitsubishi Grandis. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Wagon reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 10.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.4 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Grandis, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Wagon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Grandis. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 41 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Space Runner | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Eclipse | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Wagon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 16 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Grandis, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 320 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 240 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1545 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`100 kg | 2`250 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Mitsubishi Grandis has
| |