Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1999 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 162 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine produces 30 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Runner, whereas torque is 63 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Runner. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Space Wagon reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 8.8 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Wagon could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 41 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Space Runner | Used also on Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Wagon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is larger, but slightly lower. Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 33 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, 8 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 676 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 240 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 676 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
240 litres | 1498 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Runner (by 1258 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means Mitsubishi Space Wagon can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`180 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 6.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |