Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1999 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine produces 14 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Runner, whereas torque is 47 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Runner. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Wagon reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 9.2 | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Wagon could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Space Runner engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 40 years | 45 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Space Runner | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Runner might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is larger. Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 31 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, 8 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 240 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
240 litres | 1800 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Runner (by 1560 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means Mitsubishi Space Wagon can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`180 | 1`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |